The Archer & Abrams are good examples, both are 70tons, the Abrams tracks (around the same surface area as the Archers feet) exert 15psi on the ground, so have excellent cross country capabilities.....the Archer would be the same.
And I suppose the Abrams tank lifts one track when it moves forward then? Or maybe the archer doesn't walk as much as it shuffles along?
The point you are making of feet needing to be bigger is valid. Stating that the Abrams tank and the Archer mech would exert the same amount fo pressure on the ground while moving forward however has very little merit.
Some more numbers:
Adult horse (550 kg, 1250 lb): 170 kPa (25 psi).
A galloping horse will exert up to 3.5 MPa (500 psi).
Numbers taken from the somewhat dubious source
wikipedia/Merf - Is however fairly certain there are quite a few battlegrounds where a mech would not have to worry about "sinking".