« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: Tonnage and speed vs tonnage lost through damage  (Read 1660 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline aTolyK

  • Lance Sergeant
  • **
  • Posts: 416
  • Karma: 11
  • Prepare to be confused
Re: Tonnage and speed vs tonnage lost through damage
« Reply #45 on: December 23, 2010, 05:47:18 PM »
And then the Russians specifically hot-wire their fusion reactors and start a nuclear Armageddon.  ::)

(Disclaimer: I have slavic parents and speak fluent russian)
Logged
Are we here yet?

Dwarf Fortress: The weak shall be culled, so the strong can have nicer socks.

I killed stuff with Sparrowhawks in 0.3.2

Offline Frostiken

  • Star Colonel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1909
  • Karma: 194
Re: Tonnage and speed vs tonnage lost through damage
« Reply #46 on: December 23, 2010, 05:48:51 PM »
I think the Americans will be the first to put guns on it. Cheap and affordable? You have no idea how much money the military burns, do you :D
Logged

Offline =KoS= Saber15

  • Alphatester
  • Star Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 1802
  • Karma: 119
  • RIP AND TEAR
Re: Tonnage and speed vs tonnage lost through damage
« Reply #47 on: December 23, 2010, 05:55:39 PM »
Quote from: Frostiken on December 23, 2010, 05:48:51 PM
I think the Americans will be the first to put guns on it.
Guns, cup holders, and an automatic transmission  :P
Logged

"Concentrate on the moment, each moment is its own reality. It has a particular thisness. You can't predict, but you can explain. Or try. If you are observant, and lucky, you can say, this is why this is happening! It's very interesting!"

Offline aTolyK

  • Lance Sergeant
  • **
  • Posts: 416
  • Karma: 11
  • Prepare to be confused
Re: Tonnage and speed vs tonnage lost through damage
« Reply #48 on: December 23, 2010, 05:56:59 PM »
cheap and affordable to the army, young one! (just a figure of speach ~)
Logged
Are we here yet?

Dwarf Fortress: The weak shall be culled, so the strong can have nicer socks.

I killed stuff with Sparrowhawks in 0.3.2

Offline Taemien

  • Star Colonel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1888
  • Karma: 131
  • Less pew pew, More Dakka!
Re: Tonnage and speed vs tonnage lost through damage
« Reply #49 on: December 24, 2010, 09:16:03 AM »
Quote from: Frostiken on December 23, 2010, 05:48:51 PM
I think the Americans will be the first to put guns on it. Cheap and affordable? You have no idea how much money the military burns, do you :D



I swear I am not the reason they want to jack taxes up...

Little story about that. Takes 4 people to lift the gimble into the HMMVW. We only had two. Had to use a sledgehammer to prop it up so we could climb up into the HMMVW and then pull it in. No its not really 2 million (I think its about $450,000 to $600,000, maybe more but I doubt it), not by itself anyway.

Not going to comment on the shit we actually broke in the field  ;D
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »