Author Topic: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?  (Read 578 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ChefOfDeath

  • Bondsman
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Karma: 0
Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« on: June 07, 2011, 09:37:18 PM »
Hey, I'm running what's probably about a 4-5 year old system at this point, although I've upgraded it a little bit over the course of its life. I've got a Core 2 Duo E6600 (dual core 2.4 GHz), a 9800GTX, and 4 gigs DDR2 800. Here's the deal: I'm dual-booting XP 32-bit and Vista 64-bit, but I pretty much never use Vista on account of it being...well, Vista. However, my quirky-ass motherboard will only allow a 32-bit OS to see exactly 2 gigs of RAM, while a 64-bit OS gets the whole 4 (I know a 32-bit OS can't actually address a full 4 gigs of RAM, but I've seen other systems that will at least recognize 3 and change...). I've been playing MWLL on XP with 2 gigs of RAM, running @ 1440x900 and CCC level 3. Performance is acceptable in most cases, but it gets pretty choppy in big battles and I've been getting frequent CTD the whole time (I've only been playing for a few days, so I don't have experience with previous versions to compare). My question is this: will switching to Vista to open up those additional 2 gigs help much with either the in-game performance or CTD frequency? Or is the rest of my system too old to really have it make much difference? Since I never use Vista (don't think I've booted it on this comp in a couple years), I'll need to do a lot of housekeeping just to be able to run the game on it, not something I really want to bother with unless there's going to be a notable improvement compared to the current setup.

Oh and additionally, I use PPjoy which I hear doesn't play nice with 64-bit. Will I stand a chance of getting my joystick setup to work in Vista x64 Home Premium? The Wiki says that home editions can't change the driver code signing policy, is all that still the case?

Offline =KoS= 37

  • Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 162
  • Karma: 11
  • Knight of the Inner Sphere
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2011, 09:57:31 PM »
I'm looking at upgrading from 2GB of ram and Windows XP 32bit to 64bit windows as well, I think that doing that alone will stop most of my crashing, since I seem to mostly crash

-when memory use gets high
-mostly since .4.x and later (i.e. with the additions TC, Deathvalley, and other stuff that presumably takes more RAM)
-and also in SA I crash every 10 minutes or so, I'm not as sure that this will go away

My specs are
Windows XP 32bit
2 GB RAM (2GB died)
core 2 duo e7200 @ 3.6 ghz
4870 1GB

If I upgrade soon, which is likely, I'll let you know if just going to W7 64bit and 4 GB of RAM fixes my issues.  At this point I'm just planning to do that since I think that'll help enough considering I ran okay before and I don't feel like spending $600-800 dollars on decent parts right now.


Roster: xInVicTuSx, 37, Zeus, Saber15, Serious Table, xDeityx, Lostinnate, Finalizer, ManCowFish, LeadSponge, AAA, TheLastSnowman, ToasterPastries, Eldragon, Cmrdlenin

Offline ratbuddy

  • Star Colonel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1337
  • Karma: 75
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2011, 10:02:11 PM »
Vista is light years ahead of XP. I know it's 'cool' to say it sucks, but most people who say that have no idea what they're talking about. Make the switch.

Online Perigren

  • Alphatester
  • MechWarrior
  • *
  • Posts: 328
  • Karma: 8
  • Eh?
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2011, 10:04:37 PM »
i first ran mw:ll on core 2 duo system with a gt 7600 and 2 gigs of ram. i added a 3rd gig and it helped a bit,all on a 32 bit os,vista. never tried a 64 bit os on that rig. I am currently running win7 64 on whole new machine and let me tell you it is amazing! If you can get vista 64 bit to run it will most likely help with the crash issues but not the performance issues as your hardware is woefully inadequate.
AMD Phenom II x6 1090T BE @ 3.2 Ghz,ZALMAN CNPS9900MAX-B 135mm Long life bearing CPU Cooler
ASUS M4A89TD PRO/USB3 AM3 AMD 890FX SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Motherboard
CORSAIR XMS3 8GB (4 x 2GB)  DDR3 1333
MSI R6950 Twin Frozr III PE/OC Radeon HD 6950 2GB 256-bit GDDR5, 2x 21.5" Samsung LED monitors(BX-2231)
COOLER MASTER HAF 932 full ATX case
Kingston 96 Gb SSD, Western Digital Caviar Black 500GB 7200 RPM SATA III
Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit

Offline Come and See

  • Star Captain
  • ***
  • Posts: 1182
  • Karma: 25
  • Thunderbolts, apply directly to the forehead.
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2011, 10:08:03 PM »
Vista is light years ahead of XP. I know it's 'cool' to say it sucks, but most people who say that have no idea what they're talking about. Make the switch.

I used Vista for 2 years. Never had any hiccups or problems with it.

Windows 7 imho is just Vista 2.0 dumbed down with less UAC harassment and the new taskbar.

Offline Rally

  • Lance Captain
  • ***
  • Posts: 697
  • Karma: 12
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2011, 10:22:26 PM »
I'm not saying this is the case or anything but it's possible that switching to a different OS version will clear away your CTD issues.

Offline sleepysheep

  • Star Colonel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1936
  • Karma: 35
  • I'm me deal with it
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #6 on: June 07, 2011, 10:49:24 PM »
Vista is light years ahead of XP. I know it's 'cool' to say it sucks, but most people who say that have no idea what they're talking about. Make the switch.

I used Vista for 2 years. Never had any hiccups or problems with it.

Windows 7 imho is just Vista 2.0 dumbed down with less UAC harassment and the new taskbar.

Wouldn't say dumbed down. But yeah Win 7 is basically Vista the way it should of been. I used Vista x64 since it was available till I eventually got Win 7 after I got a new PC. Never really had a problem with Vista x64, and at least driver support is still pretty good.
Sandy 2500k @ 4.6ghz
GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 V1.0 - Worst Motherboard ever.
2x GTX 580 3gb
8gb DDR3 dual channl 1600mhz
HX 1000W Corsair
Win 7 x64 Home Edition
5970x1200 Or 1920x1200 Triple Screen 26" Monitors
Dx10 Max settings 16xAF 8xAA

Offline Gremlich

  • Lance Captain
  • ***
  • Posts: 586
  • Karma: 27
    • Clan Blood Spirit
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #7 on: June 07, 2011, 11:10:41 PM »
use joytokey for your js
“Fail to honor people, they fail to honor you; but of a good leader, who talks little, when his work is done, his aims fulfilled, they will all say, 'We did this ourselves.'” -- Lao Tzu


Offline Freeborn_Toad

  • Lance Sergeant
  • **
  • Posts: 377
  • Karma: 26
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2011, 12:11:12 AM »
I've used Vista, and I've been using Windows 7/Server 2008 R2 more or less since their release, and quite honestly, outside of DX10/11 they do absolutely nothing that I cannot do just as well with XP x64. Indeed, they do a few things worse (no globally adjustable setting for windows explorer views still pisses me off).

That said, DX10/11 is so omnipresent now that there is a compelling reason to have one of the newer OSes. I still think Vista is a clunky, bloated monstrosity of an OS (and 7 isn't that much better), but for gaming, it still has more utility than XP, at this point.

Regardless, 32-bit OSes are a disaster with modern hardware and Crysis, at least if you are using a decent GPU and play for more than an hour or two at a time. I ran into unsolvable memory addressing/driver issues, even when I was only using 3GiB of memory, on 32-bit windows, that were immediately solved by moving to a 64-bit OS (didn't matter what flavor of 64-bit Windows either).

I'm not familiar with PPjoy or joytokey, so I cannot comment on those.

Offline GB-72AT Talon

  • Star Colonel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1234
  • Karma: 39
  • Don't quote me on this.....
    • GB72nd Assault Trinary
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2011, 01:08:41 AM »
XP was just terrible at a few critical things.  Memory management was one.  That dumbass OS would absolutely insist on raping your hard drive and would ignore that expensive memory (at the time XP was new) .  You can do tweaks to pagefile and whatnot to help but at the end of the day XP's memory allocation was shit compared to Vista or 7.

XP is also horrible in terms of fragmentation.  Of course, once again, you can modify it to auto defrag and whatnot but I expect more from the top of class OS.  XP was also terrible about letting shit files just get all left behind and all.  You have to spend time hunting down and deleting junk constantly with XP. After a while it gets slow no matter what you did.  I never had an XP install that lasted over a year and I used to build systems for myself and others.  Rule of thumb was if its got a bunch of crap on it and its slow it was more worth your time to just format and reinstall clean. 

I don't know why the OP wants to use Vista.  While it is much better than XP there's really no reason to use it when 7 x64 is the best choice today.



Sure it felt different but so did my wife after the kids were born. A little loose but it still gets me off every time. -- Suspect

Offline Stahlseele

  • Living Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4111
  • Karma: 43
  • 2nd Level TechSupport Agent(BOFH)
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #10 on: June 08, 2011, 01:54:06 AM »
maybe 'cause they got rid of the classical start menu and to a certain extent of the task bar? O.o
it's reason enough for ME not to put it on my main rig . . it's only on the old ones and the laptop because it needs less power . .
'any kind of discussion of randomness ALWAYS WILL EQUATE to being able to critically hit a mech's reactor by firing a micro beam laser while facing 80 degrees to the side, shooting the ground, which would cause a random explosion which would randomly crit his entire team's reactors which would randomly cause the server itself to explode which would randomly generate a strange quark which would randomly hit the earth and randomly randomness randomfapp the shit fapp random!'
------------------------------
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 @4x3GHz
Memory: GSkill 2x4Gb DDR3 1333Mhz
Video: MSI N580GTX Lightning Xtreme Edition 3072MB
HDD: 2xWD Velociraptor74Gig10k RPM SATA  RAID0; 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB, 1x WD Caviar Green 2TB
Monitor: 2x24" Widescreen 16:9 1920x1080 native resolution
Windows Vista

Offline CGB [CoffiNail]

  • Star Colonel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1883
  • Karma: 97
  • S. Col. of Clan Ghost Bear 304th Assault Cluster
    • 304th Assault Cluster
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #11 on: June 08, 2011, 02:32:14 AM »
maybe 'cause they got rid of the classical start menu and to a certain extent of the task bar? O.o
it's reason enough for ME not to put it on my main rig . . it's only on the old ones and the laptop because it needs less power . .
can you not just activate both of these? I know the task bar can be made to show program names like it use too



Offline Stahlseele

  • Living Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4111
  • Karma: 43
  • 2nd Level TechSupport Agent(BOFH)
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #12 on: June 08, 2011, 02:34:20 AM »
maybe 'cause they got rid of the classical start menu and to a certain extent of the task bar? O.o
it's reason enough for ME not to put it on my main rig . . it's only on the old ones and the laptop because it needs less power . .
can you not just activate both of these? I know the task bar can be made to show program names like it use too
Nope, you have to use 3rd party software for the Start-Menu at least.
The Task-Bar can be gotten right 95% with some creative windows tinkering.
'any kind of discussion of randomness ALWAYS WILL EQUATE to being able to critically hit a mech's reactor by firing a micro beam laser while facing 80 degrees to the side, shooting the ground, which would cause a random explosion which would randomly crit his entire team's reactors which would randomly cause the server itself to explode which would randomly generate a strange quark which would randomly hit the earth and randomly randomness randomfapp the shit fapp random!'
------------------------------
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 @4x3GHz
Memory: GSkill 2x4Gb DDR3 1333Mhz
Video: MSI N580GTX Lightning Xtreme Edition 3072MB
HDD: 2xWD Velociraptor74Gig10k RPM SATA  RAID0; 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB, 1x WD Caviar Green 2TB
Monitor: 2x24" Widescreen 16:9 1920x1080 native resolution
Windows Vista

Offline =CJW= Rad Hanzo

  • Lance Captain
  • ***
  • Posts: 727
  • Karma: 23
  • Ever did a 540 Indy Grab with an Atlas ?
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #13 on: June 08, 2011, 09:17:43 AM »
Make Vista64 your prime OSsince youve got it already.
Its just being said it was a shitty OS by many a user, but thats something im not believing(it still can bitch around...but tell me which OS doesnt bitch from time to time).
The 64 bit will give you huge advantages when it comes to the requirements of modern games, and do NOT be fooled : MWLL is top of the pops in this regard. Even gives really cranked up PCs something to work.

Upgrade your CPU and GPU: both bottlenecks, sadly.

Q9550 @3.83GHZ;Win7-64Bit;Asus P5Q-Deluxe;Asus GTX580 DC2 (905Core/1810Shader/2099Mem);8GB Corsair XMS2 899MHz



Appearances on the photos: Deathbane , Bill , Rad|Yalk , Bill , Rad
Location : Frontsteps, Imperial War Museum, London

Offline (TLL)Frosted

  • MechWarrior
  • **
  • Posts: 265
  • Karma: 8
Re: Where am I being bottlenecked the most?
« Reply #14 on: June 08, 2011, 02:06:06 PM »
I deactivated every eye candy for vista it piratically looks like 98.

I also never had issue with vista but I also didn't buy early on so it got time to get patched.