Author Topic: Me3 Multiplayer?  (Read 2150 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline SquareSphere }12thVR{

  • Living Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4518
  • Karma: 186
  • pancake slinging, Square (care) Bear of MWLL
    • 12th Vegan Rangers - Boards
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2011, 06:34:05 PM »
sounds like they'll probably have a horde mode or something co op ish like that.
Want to give organized battles a spin?
Not sure about your skills but want to test them out?
Looking for a casual unit?
12th Vegan Rangers are recruiting!  Click here to check out our new boards!

FLAWLESS VICTORY


Offline Sesambrot

  • MWLL Developer
  • Star Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 1392
  • Karma: 62
  • What would a pirate do?
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2011, 06:36:22 PM »
Sounds interessting, but I'm not gonna get excited about that until I see some footage of it.
Tho I somehow trust Bioware to make it unique! :)
If at first you don't succeed try again, and if you don't try again, you'll be hit in the face with a shovel!
"I'm a piece of C.R.A.P."

Offline =KoS= Eldragon

  • Living Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 2325
  • Karma: 85
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2011, 06:47:33 PM »
I'd rather they focus on making the single player ME3 the best it can be, and do a multiplayer ME title separately. 

After the massive disappointment Dragon Age 2 turned out to be, it wouldn't surprise me at all if the single player suffers for this.

Online Urishima }12thVR{

  • MechWarrior
  • **
  • Posts: 247
  • Karma: 24
  • Abacus
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2011, 07:51:47 PM »
WTF is this shit?
Ghiest: I suggest trying to control your forum torrettes with copious amounts of weed.

KingLeerUK: Right now playing puretech is like riding a bike without a seat; you're putting yourself through some unnecessary discomfort and everyone else on the trail is looking at you funny.

Bill: You're a massive gay. Let's bum.
Deathbane: Let's.

My Youtube channel filled with MWLL awesomeness!

Offline CHHš Aethon

  • Alphatester
  • Lance Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 673
  • Karma: 30
  • Clan Hell's Horses - Might before metal.
    • Hell's Horses HQ
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2011, 06:47:12 AM »
Awesome sauce.  Makes me think one or both characters in multiplayer might NOT be Shepard, or even human for that matter.
“I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell.” - Harry S. Truman

Offline xInVicTuSx

  • Alphatester
  • Living Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 2875
  • Karma: 128
  • Knight of the Inner Sphere
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #6 on: October 11, 2011, 08:17:02 AM »
Grrrr. Bioware focus on singleplayer for ME3 and pour more multiplayer man hours into ToR.  ::)

-Invictus ne Vindicetur-

KNIGHTS GRAND 5V5 TOURNAMENT THIS MARCH! More info below.
http://forum.mechlivinglegends.net/index.php/topic,16841.msg287300.html#msg287300

Offline Sesambrot

  • MWLL Developer
  • Star Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 1392
  • Karma: 62
  • What would a pirate do?
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2011, 12:21:36 PM »
After the massive disappointment Dragon Age 2 turned out to be, it wouldn't surprise me at all if the single player suffers for this.
Btw, what went wrong with Dragon Age 2? I must admit, I never even played either of the two as I didn't find the combatmechanic all that appealing in the first place, but was it story or gameplay that was disappointing?
If at first you don't succeed try again, and if you don't try again, you'll be hit in the face with a shovel!
"I'm a piece of C.R.A.P."

Offline DFDelta

  • Star Colonel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1724
  • Karma: 114
    • My Youtube page
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #8 on: October 11, 2011, 12:45:31 PM »
After the massive disappointment Dragon Age 2 turned out to be, it wouldn't surprise me at all if the single player suffers for this.
Btw, what went wrong with Dragon Age 2? I must admit, I never even played either of the two as I didn't find the combatmechanic all that appealing in the first place, but was it story or gameplay that was disappointing?

Dragon Age 2 was actually one of the worst RPGs I've played in years.
It has like 6 types of enemies: (Semi-)Human Warriors/Mages/Rogues/Assasins, Animals and Big guys (Ogres and stuff)
They all fight kinda the same. If you've killed human rogues, then you can already guess what a darkspawn rogue does, if you fought a wolf before you already know what a giant rat will do, and so on.

All the areas look the same. You cross about 20 or so caves, all looking the same, just the order of the rooms were changed a little (and not even that very often.). The cave that you've found out in the mountains looks just like the one that you've found under a house. Same textures, same room designs.

The skill sytem is even worse then the one from the first (I think they have even removed some skills/spells), and I found even that one rather bad.

Story was... meh, I would not have complained if it came from a smaller developer, but for a Bioware game it was a huge disappointment. It was dragged on for far too long, and it doesn't really start with any interesting stuff until you're 3/4 trough the game.

The whole game feels like they have tried to put as little work as possible into it.

If I had to rate it I'd give it a 5 out of 10 or so......
Never arm once what you could arm twice.

In Lyran Commonwealth, Atlas scouts you.

Offline Sesambrot

  • MWLL Developer
  • Star Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 1392
  • Karma: 62
  • What would a pirate do?
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #9 on: October 11, 2011, 01:58:49 PM »


it seems to me that quite a few games tend to end up like that lately, whether they copied from other games, or just copied from themselves (which is even more stupid)
If you think about that then ME1 was actually kinda the same, all those planets you could explore just ended up looking pretty much the same but with different colors. In fact, exploring those was very boring and repetitive, just like scanning in ME2...

If you compare ME1 and 2 they seem like rather different games, especially regarding gameplay.
I mean not having to deal with all that loot sure is a relieve, but I would have liked to chose from a bigger pool of weapons, and I really missed the mods.
Also the Thermomags they introduced were a nice change, but it simply didn't add up. at first you had those weapons that could basically fire infinitely but may overheat eventually, and then someone invented those thermomags which basically act exactly like ammo, and your weapon becomes useless as soon as you don't have any left.
And the Normandy being shot down at the beginning and Shepard supposedly dying, while seeming to be an important part of the story, felt more like an excuse to let people recreate their character later on. I'm kinda curious how they'll go about that for ME3...

Back to Dragon Age, as I said I haven't played either of the two, but I believe part of the disappointment comes from expecting too much of the sequel. People tend to believe that a sequel is going to be even better than the original, and then are disappointed if it's not.

Regarding ME, I think 2 was a little better than the first one mainly because of the gameplay changes they made, even tho some didn't add up, and I think the storytelling was a little better as well. However I for one don't expect ME3 to be all that much different from ME2, especially not as much as ME2 was different from ME1. The gameplay in ME2 seemed really decent and maybe they might have to make some tweaks if they plan on making a multiplayer mode, but I don't think they could get away with major changes like the last time.

In any case, I'm going to buy ME3 for the singleplayer and because I wanna know how that story ends, and not for the multiplayer. However, I'm not going to expect it to be even greater/bigger/better than ME1 or ME2, but if it can at least keep up the standard those two have set, then it's going to be a worthy threequel.
If at first you don't succeed try again, and if you don't try again, you'll be hit in the face with a shovel!
"I'm a piece of C.R.A.P."

Offline ~SJ~ Xarg Talasko

  • Living Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 2302
  • Karma: 111
  • KANE LIVES!
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #10 on: October 11, 2011, 02:06:20 PM »
WarShip me. :]

Uh.. if you insist, Ms. Bay...


Thief gameplay + Doom3 engine = The Dark Mod

Offline DFDelta

  • Star Colonel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1724
  • Karma: 114
    • My Youtube page
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #11 on: October 11, 2011, 02:08:44 PM »
I'm mostly looking forward to see what my early choices will do to the storyline. I have 2 characters ready for part 3, both taking the opposite choice from the other (Killing the rachni queen/Saving the queen), and I can't wait to see how everything comes together.

Yeah, the weapon and armor mods are what I really missed in the second game, and the mags felt stupid. But overall gameplay was very nice, so I could live with it.
Never arm once what you could arm twice.

In Lyran Commonwealth, Atlas scouts you.

Offline Sesambrot

  • MWLL Developer
  • Star Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 1392
  • Karma: 62
  • What would a pirate do?
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #12 on: October 11, 2011, 03:28:05 PM »
Has anyone read the update about the Multiplayer yet?
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/321946/mass-effect-3-multiplayer-can-affect-single-player-campaign-first-details/

Really sounds like an interessting idea.
If at first you don't succeed try again, and if you don't try again, you'll be hit in the face with a shovel!
"I'm a piece of C.R.A.P."

Offline =KoS= Eldragon

  • Living Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 2325
  • Karma: 85
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #13 on: October 11, 2011, 03:30:01 PM »
I liked ME1 better than ME2. Mostly because I hated the planet exploration system/minigame in ME2, and really missed going down to the planet to explore. Sure the planets were pretty much the same, but they were optional and at least fun.  I won't be picking up ME3 at launch, but rather waiting for the reviews and the price to hit $20-30 or so. 

After the massive disappointment Dragon Age 2 turned out to be, it wouldn't surprise me at all if the single player suffers for this.
Btw, what went wrong with Dragon Age 2? I must admit, I never even played either of the two as I didn't find the combatmechanic all that appealing in the first place, but was it story or gameplay that was disappointing?

Story had its issues (your choices don't matter, but the game tries very hard to make you think they do), but it's mostly game play.  DFDelta covered a good chunk of it, and I could write a great length of all the bad design choices.

Quote
Back to Dragon Age, as I said I haven't played either of the two, but I believe part of the disappointment comes from expecting too much of the sequel. People tend to believe that a sequel is going to be even better than the original, and then are disappointed if it's not.

This is not the case at all. The transition from DA:O to DA2 was a total game mechanics rewrite.  They are totally different games. The only thing they share in common is the game universe lore and  the usual fantasy RPG fare (Spells, swords, classes, levels, etc). Put a different title and change the pronouns and I wouldn't even recognize it as Dragon Age.

The short version is DA2 was rushed out the door to capitalize on the popularity of DA:Origins combined with a desire to make the game appealing to "Casual" gamers. Thus totally pissing off fans of RPGs.  Tactical depth and unique combat and locations was replaced with a mindless hack and slash mechanic. But at least hack and slash games have more than a half dozen areas and monsters.

So to put it in a way Mech fans would appreciate: Dragon Age is like Mechwarrior, Dragon Age 2 is like MechAssault. If the game wasn't trying to pretend to be sequel of DA:O, but instead called Dragon Age: Assault it would have been better received.  I won't fault anyone for liking DA2, but for me its just a disappointment, and DA3 is looking to be no better.

Offline SquareSphere }12thVR{

  • Living Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4518
  • Karma: 186
  • pancake slinging, Square (care) Bear of MWLL
    • 12th Vegan Rangers - Boards
Re: Me3 Multiplayer?
« Reply #14 on: October 11, 2011, 03:54:21 PM »
http://kotaku.com/5848484/mass-effect-3s-co+op-multiplayer-fully-detailed-by-bioware

highlight
Quote
BioWare also details Mass Effect 3: Galaxy at War, "a new way for players to manage and experience the galactic war from multiple fronts, including a new 4-player co-op mode." Galaxy at War, BioWare says, affects a player's "'Galactic Readiness' level, measured by Commander Shepard's ability to apply every possible asset – people, weapons, resources, armies, fleets – in the final battle against the Reapers."
Want to give organized battles a spin?
Not sure about your skills but want to test them out?
Looking for a casual unit?
12th Vegan Rangers are recruiting!  Click here to check out our new boards!

FLAWLESS VICTORY